Airport body scanners not a health risk: study
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Airport body scanners not a health risk: study
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
WASHINGTON: Full-body scanners used to secure airports, about 1,000 of which will be deployed across the United States by year's end, do not pose health risks, a study released has found.
The University of California study appearing in the "Archives of Internal Medicine" found that a traveler would have to go through a body scanner 50 times to receive the same amount of radiation as from a dental X-ray.
The researchers also said a lung X-ray was equivalent to 1,000 trips through an airport scanner, while a mammogram delivers as much radiation as passing through such a scanner 4,000 times.
The study focused on x-ray machines dubbed "backscatter" which use low-dose x-rays, similar to those used in medical imaging. So far there are some 486 full-body scanners in place in 78 US airports.
"The radiation doses emitted by the scans are extremely small; the scans deliver an amount of radiation equivalent to 3 to 9 minutes of the radiation received through normal daily living," the authors wrote.
And "since flying itself increases exposure to ionizing radiation, the scan will contribute less than one percent of the dose a flyer will receive from exposure to cosmic rays at elevated altitudes," they added.
"The estimation of cancer risks associated with these scans is difficult, but using the only available models, the risk would be extremely small, even among frequent flyers. We conclude that there is no significant threat of radiation from the scans," they wrote.
Advanced imaging technology X-ray scanners currently in use at airports around the United States sparked an uproar among travelers because they produce a graphic image of a person's naked body, genitalia and all.
Others have worried the scans might be unsafe. (AFP)
WASHINGTON: Full-body scanners used to secure airports, about 1,000 of which will be deployed across the United States by year's end, do not pose health risks, a study released has found.
The University of California study appearing in the "Archives of Internal Medicine" found that a traveler would have to go through a body scanner 50 times to receive the same amount of radiation as from a dental X-ray.
The researchers also said a lung X-ray was equivalent to 1,000 trips through an airport scanner, while a mammogram delivers as much radiation as passing through such a scanner 4,000 times.
The study focused on x-ray machines dubbed "backscatter" which use low-dose x-rays, similar to those used in medical imaging. So far there are some 486 full-body scanners in place in 78 US airports.
"The radiation doses emitted by the scans are extremely small; the scans deliver an amount of radiation equivalent to 3 to 9 minutes of the radiation received through normal daily living," the authors wrote.
And "since flying itself increases exposure to ionizing radiation, the scan will contribute less than one percent of the dose a flyer will receive from exposure to cosmic rays at elevated altitudes," they added.
"The estimation of cancer risks associated with these scans is difficult, but using the only available models, the risk would be extremely small, even among frequent flyers. We conclude that there is no significant threat of radiation from the scans," they wrote.
Advanced imaging technology X-ray scanners currently in use at airports around the United States sparked an uproar among travelers because they produce a graphic image of a person's naked body, genitalia and all.
Others have worried the scans might be unsafe. (AFP)
Rao Muhammad Aftab- Monstars
-
Posts : 1091
Join date : 2011-02-11
Age : 35
Similar topics
» Body scanners at US airports may be dangerous
» Dioxin egg 'no health risk': UK watchdog
» Study hints multivitamins aid women's heart health
» Removing Fallopians cuts ovarian cancer risk: Study
» Green leafy vegetables cut diabetes risk: study
» Dioxin egg 'no health risk': UK watchdog
» Study hints multivitamins aid women's heart health
» Removing Fallopians cuts ovarian cancer risk: Study
» Green leafy vegetables cut diabetes risk: study
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sat May 04, 2024 11:49 am by ali001
» house disrepair claims
Thu May 02, 2024 4:29 pm by Ibad Khan Buledi
» Bounce n Bang: Physics puzzler
Thu May 02, 2024 11:39 am by ali001
» AIChatSY - AIChatbot Assistant
Wed May 01, 2024 10:48 am by ali001
» Storybook Magic App
Tue Apr 30, 2024 7:06 pm by ali001
» Flower Book Match3 Puzzle Game
Tue Apr 30, 2024 12:17 pm by ali001
» Avian Influenza Symptom in Chickens "Bird Flu H5N1 Virus" Vet learning materials, Poultry Farming
Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:57 am by Ibad Khan Buledi
» Aloha Planner - Note-Taker
Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:52 pm by ali001
» Streaming Guide Film TV Series
Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:39 pm by ali001