More tests not always needed for diagnosis
Page 1 of 1 • Share
More tests not always needed for diagnosis
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
NEW YORK: Examining patients and taking a medical history are more useful to hospital doctors in diagnosing patients than high-tech scans, according to a study from Israel.
Tests such as CT scans and ultrasounds add to hospital bills, but doctors said that such tests given right after patients showed up in emergency rooms only helped with diagnosis in roughly one of three cases, the study -- published in the Archives of Internal Medicine -- said.
There is also research showing that the radiation from multiple CT scans might increase the risk of cancer over the long term.
To see whether such scans were really helpful, researchers led by Ami Schattner of Kaplan Medical Center in Rehovot, Israel, followed all the patients who showed up at the emergency room of a teaching hospital and were subsequently admitted.
Over about two months, Schattner and his colleagues observed 442 consecutive patients. Each was separately examined by two doctors, a resident and a senior physician, who also asked patients about past health problems.
Both doctors had access to results from all routine tests, including blood and urine analysis, and any extra scans that had been done when the patient first got to the emergency room.
The researchers later looked at how accurate the clinicians were in their decisions, compared to the final diagnoses patients were given during or after their hospitalization. They also asked the doctors what factors they relied on most when diagnosing each patient.
Both clinicians made the correct diagnosis between 80 and 85 percent of the time.
Only about one in six patients had extra testing – mostly CT scans, usually of the head -- done in the emergency room. The rest just had simple blood, urine or heart tests.
But even for the patients who did have extra scans, the doctors said the results helped to make a diagnosis only about one-third of the time.
Instead, patient history alone or history plus a physical exam were most important to a doctor's correct diagnosis in almost 60 percent of cases. When basic tests were included, they were the basis of more than 90 percent of correct diagnoses along with the history and exam. (Reuters)
NEW YORK: Examining patients and taking a medical history are more useful to hospital doctors in diagnosing patients than high-tech scans, according to a study from Israel.
Tests such as CT scans and ultrasounds add to hospital bills, but doctors said that such tests given right after patients showed up in emergency rooms only helped with diagnosis in roughly one of three cases, the study -- published in the Archives of Internal Medicine -- said.
There is also research showing that the radiation from multiple CT scans might increase the risk of cancer over the long term.
To see whether such scans were really helpful, researchers led by Ami Schattner of Kaplan Medical Center in Rehovot, Israel, followed all the patients who showed up at the emergency room of a teaching hospital and were subsequently admitted.
Over about two months, Schattner and his colleagues observed 442 consecutive patients. Each was separately examined by two doctors, a resident and a senior physician, who also asked patients about past health problems.
Both doctors had access to results from all routine tests, including blood and urine analysis, and any extra scans that had been done when the patient first got to the emergency room.
The researchers later looked at how accurate the clinicians were in their decisions, compared to the final diagnoses patients were given during or after their hospitalization. They also asked the doctors what factors they relied on most when diagnosing each patient.
Both clinicians made the correct diagnosis between 80 and 85 percent of the time.
Only about one in six patients had extra testing – mostly CT scans, usually of the head -- done in the emergency room. The rest just had simple blood, urine or heart tests.
But even for the patients who did have extra scans, the doctors said the results helped to make a diagnosis only about one-third of the time.
Instead, patient history alone or history plus a physical exam were most important to a doctor's correct diagnosis in almost 60 percent of cases. When basic tests were included, they were the basis of more than 90 percent of correct diagnoses along with the history and exam. (Reuters)
Rao Muhammad Aftab- Monstars
-
Posts : 1091
Join date : 2011-02-11
Age : 35
Similar topics
» Dual diagnosis drug addiction treatment
» Experts call for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's in Asia
» ISL201 - Islamic Studies GDB Solution Needed
» Global move needed to battle cancer in poor countries
» US tests Osama's DNA, used facial ID'
» Experts call for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's in Asia
» ISL201 - Islamic Studies GDB Solution Needed
» Global move needed to battle cancer in poor countries
» US tests Osama's DNA, used facial ID'
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thu Nov 21, 2024 6:50 pm by ali001
» AMERICA EARNS! - Gift Card App
Mon Nov 18, 2024 11:07 am by ali001
» Kanba - Manage your Tasks
Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:21 pm by ali001
» Hemangiom'App
Tue Nov 05, 2024 11:25 am by ali001
» MindfulMe - Mental Health App
Mon Nov 04, 2024 10:50 am by ali001
» Learn Candlestick Patterns
Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:51 am by ali001
» Woh Pagal Si Episode 52 to 62 - Top Pakistani Drama
Sat Sep 21, 2024 6:26 pm by Mir Emmad Ali Khan Domki
» Nearu - share your socials
Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:12 pm by ali001
» Nightclub Tycoon: Idle Empire
Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:16 pm by ali001